Article
Article
- Engineering & Materials
- Propulsion
- Environmental life-cycle impact of alternative aviation fuels
DISCLAIMER: This article is being kept online for historical purposes. Though accurate at last review, it is no longer being updated. The page may contain broken links or outdated information.
Environmental life-cycle impact of alternative aviation fuels
Article By:
Cox, Kelly The Boeing Company, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Last reviewed:2014
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1036/1097-8542.YB140408
- Feedstock overview
- Assigning impacts to coproducts
- Results
- Conclusion
- Related Primary Literature
- Additional Reading
As world fuel prices increase and people become more aware of the role of fossil fuels in creating carbon emissions, there is an increased need for alternative aviation fuels that are renewable, sustainable, and economically viable. The aviation industry currently creates 2% of worldwide carbon emissions and 12% of emissions from the transport sector, but alternative aviation fuels produced from renewable feedstocks have the potential to reduce fuel life cycle emissions by up to 80%. While it has been demonstrated that commercial flights can be flown successfully using a range of different alternative fuels and blends, feasibility assessments of such fuels must include an evaluation of compliance with regulatory bodies' requirements and quantification of reductions in environmental emissions. One method that identifies the potential environmental impacts of producing aviation fuel from alternative sources is life-cycle assessment (LCA). LCA accounts for emissions from the entire life cycle of the fuel, from growing and harvesting the feedstock in the field through refining the fuel to its combustion in an aircraft. LCA studies are becoming increasingly popular as more alternative fuels are investigated; one example is the study conducted in 2010 by Russell W. Stratton, Hsin Min Wong, and James I. Hileman, which analyzed greenhouse gas emissions for a range of potential aviation fuel feedstocks in the United States, including soybean, palm, jatropha, and algae oil. The study also applied different LCA methods and feedstock yield rates to each pathway in order to show the sensitivity of the results to various model assumptions. There are numerous possible feedstock-to-fuel pathways that can be modeled, many of which are still on a lab scale and not yet ready for commercialization. See also: Green aviation
The content above is only an excerpt.
for your institution. Subscribe
To learn more about subscribing to AccessScience, or to request a no-risk trial of this award-winning scientific reference for your institution, fill in your information and a member of our Sales Team will contact you as soon as possible.
to your librarian. Recommend
Let your librarian know about the award-winning gateway to the most trustworthy and accurate scientific information.
About AccessScience
AccessScience provides the most accurate and trustworthy scientific information available.
Recognized as an award-winning gateway to scientific knowledge, AccessScience is an amazing online resource that contains high-quality reference material written specifically for students. Contributors include more than 10,000 highly qualified scientists and 46 Nobel Prize winners.
MORE THAN 8700 articles covering all major scientific disciplines and encompassing the McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Science & Technology and McGraw-Hill Yearbook of Science & Technology
115,000-PLUS definitions from the McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms
3000 biographies of notable scientific figures
MORE THAN 19,000 downloadable images and animations illustrating key topics
ENGAGING VIDEOS highlighting the life and work of award-winning scientists
SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER STUDY and additional readings to guide students to deeper understanding and research
LINKS TO CITABLE LITERATURE help students expand their knowledge using primary sources of information